OK, I know this is pretty inflammatory. Anyone who has read this blog for a long period of time knows that I'm a music lover. I love everything about music, especially listening to and talking about music.
So today I'm going to lay out my argument for why I don't like the #1 band on VH1's 100 Greatest Artists of Hard Rock.
I guess the best way to lay out my argument is this. Imagine that I call you tomorrow on the phone and tell you that I've just eaten an incredible ham sandwich at a very fancy restaurant. You're initially skeptical, but I soon win you over with my lavish description of the subtle intricacies of the grain in the bread, the pleasant texture of the ham and the surprisingly nutty taste of the cheese. Soon you're super jazzed to eat that ham sandwich. You decide to go to the restaurant, and it turns out I'm right, it's a really good sandwich.
The sandwich is pretty awesome, but the next time you go, you wonder if the rest of the food on the menu is equally good. So you try the pot roast, the quiche and the steak. Surprisingly, they're all really good and, as a matter of fact, you sorta prefer those items to the ham sandwich.
You call me to tell me of this amazing discovery, but I'm not pleased... I'm just upset. The ham sandwich is the best item there and you're violently wrong if you disagree.
But the ham sandwich is really good, you say, but I think there are better foods at the restaurant.
Well, you're wrong and you don't know anything about music, I say, before bottling my own farts for future sniffing.
Point being, Led Zeppelin is the ham sandwich of the restaurant. It's certainly deserving of praise; it's really good, and definitely worth it now and then. But hype has already killed it. No matter how much you try it in the future, you'll always have a nagging suspicion in the back of your mind that you're doing it wrong. You must not be appreciating the music enough, or your tastes must not be varied enough.
You're too dumb for Zepp.
Well, little mister, let me tell you what. Led Zeppelin sucks. They're definitely technically proficient, and have created some pretty good music, but they're definitely not worth the praise. Solid rock? Yes. The musical messiah? No.
If we're talking about the combining of music genres into something new, they were already beaten by early jazz musicians and some of the first rock bands. If we're talking solid song-writing, Rush is just as (if not more) poetic. If we're talking about songs to get people directly into a rocking mood, The Who have an arguably better overall catalogue.
Factor this in with the off-stage antics of the band (such as their fickle and uneven licensing policies, or their unwillingness to reunite even temporarily without exploding spectacularly) and you've got a truly talented band that's been over-praised, over-hyped and blown out of proportion.
And I'm OK with that. I've worked past that nagging feeling that I'm not 'getting it'.
Music critique ruined Led Zeppelin for me. Led Zeppelin ruined Led Zeppelin for me.
And it's OK; there's other main courses in the restaurant.
|